Legal

Epstein's Power of Attorney — How He Legally Controlled Wexner's Affairs

At some point in the late 1980s or early 1990s, Les Wexner granted Jeffrey Epstein a broad power of attorney — legal authority to act on Wexner's behalf in financial and business matters. This extraordinary grant of authority is documented in a 1991 agreement that was later reviewed in litigation. The POA represents one of the most legally significant documents in understanding the Wexner-Epstein relationship.

What Is a Power of Attorney?

A power of attorney (POA) is a legal document authorizing one person (the “agent”) to act on behalf of another (the “principal”) in legal, financial, or other matters:

  • Limited POA: Authority for specific transactions or circumstances
  • General POA: Broad authority across financial and legal matters
  • Durable POA: Remains effective if the principal becomes incapacitated
  • Springing POA: Activates only under specified conditions

The POA Wexner granted Epstein was effectively a general, broad-authority instrument.

The 1991 POA Document

A 1991 power of attorney document granting Epstein authority over Wexner’s affairs was reviewed in litigation and referenced in court filings. Key provisions reportedly included:

  • Authority to execute contracts on Wexner’s behalf
  • Authority to transfer assets
  • Authority to manage financial accounts
  • Authority to hire and fire staff in Wexner’s businesses
  • Authority to make real estate decisions

This level of authority exceeds what financial advisers typically receive. It is comparable to the authority given to a trusted family member — not an external adviser.

When It Was Granted

The origin of the POA appears to be in the late 1980s — shortly after Wexner and Epstein established their relationship. It was documented in a 1991 form that reflected authority already in practice.

What Epstein Did With It

The POA enabled Epstein to:

  • Execute the transfer of 9 East 71st Street (the Manhattan mansion) to himself
  • Manage Wexner’s Cardinal Trust and related entities
  • Move money through accounts connected to Wexner’s interests
  • Operate as Wexner’s agent in dealings with banks, lawyers, and business counterparties

Wexner’s Post-2019 Position

After Epstein’s 2019 arrest, Wexner stated:

  • He had terminated the relationship in 2007
  • He claimed Epstein had “misappropriated vast sums” from his foundation
  • He expressed horror at the crimes

However, critics noted:

  • A general power of attorney cannot be exercised in secret — Wexner would have seen its effects
  • The Manhattan mansion transfer was publicly recorded
  • Wexner’s claim that he was defrauded is inconsistent with the extraordinary trust level the POA represents

The POA is legally significant because it:

  • Illustrates the extraordinary intimacy of the Wexner-Epstein relationship
  • Was the legal mechanism enabling the Manhattan mansion transfer
  • Was the foundation of Epstein’s claimed financial management authority
  • Creates questions about what Wexner knew about Epstein’s overall activities

Related Keywords

epstein power of attorney wexnerepstein legal authority wexnerwexner power of attorney epsteinepstein broad power of attorney